” The slumdogs millionaire “
I did not watch this film before, with all World . But I can understand feelings the some indian people in this occasion. To understand... For example, I do not know any screen version of novels of Tolstoi which would satisfy me as the spectator (only Feodor Bondarchuk and his “War and Peace”. I adore his Pierre Bezuhov) But I know that the Hollywood adaptations are very popular around the world, but not in Russia. “Anna Karenina”, “Doctor Zhivago”, ” The Master and Margarita ” at last. Only the Russian director, a script writer, the playwright, the actor can adapt, play, to filming creations of Russian classical writers. Music can destroy much more borders than cinema. The literature is as the woman without complexes. But the cinema is other business.The cinema in India is not only business (and not only in India), it is the tool. I do not like, when in foreign films the Russians are drunk and constantly use "fuck" as an interjection. And I can understand, that the social drama about people living in poverty can like not to all. Sweet histories about one-way love and terrible intrigues of parents is one (and it is cinema is necessary too, differently it would not have a box-office). Histories about difficulties of a life and about how people overcome them, it is another. My country is worthy of demonstrations both its great sides, and not also. If I perceive my country (in which I live) only as the Native land of Tolstoi, Dostoevsky and Perestroika and if I do not accept intrusion into Afghanistan, destruction of the Caucasian nationalities, a genocide in the present day which is in Russia — it means I’m not the citizen of my country. It is easy to tell to itself, that the negative is not exist. But it is difficult to admit to itself that it is, and more difficult to resist to this, try to change it.
The cinema is the great tool.
With sincerity from Magas
I did not watch this film before, with all World . But I can understand feelings the some indian people in this occasion. To understand... For example, I do not know any screen version of novels of Tolstoi which would satisfy me as the spectator (only Feodor Bondarchuk and his “War and Peace”. I adore his Pierre Bezuhov) But I know that the Hollywood adaptations are very popular around the world, but not in Russia. “Anna Karenina”, “Doctor Zhivago”, ” The Master and Margarita ” at last. Only the Russian director, a script writer, the playwright, the actor can adapt, play, to filming creations of Russian classical writers. Music can destroy much more borders than cinema. The literature is as the woman without complexes. But the cinema is other business.The cinema in India is not only business (and not only in India), it is the tool. I do not like, when in foreign films the Russians are drunk and constantly use "fuck" as an interjection. And I can understand, that the social drama about people living in poverty can like not to all. Sweet histories about one-way love and terrible intrigues of parents is one (and it is cinema is necessary too, differently it would not have a box-office). Histories about difficulties of a life and about how people overcome them, it is another. My country is worthy of demonstrations both its great sides, and not also. If I perceive my country (in which I live) only as the Native land of Tolstoi, Dostoevsky and Perestroika and if I do not accept intrusion into Afghanistan, destruction of the Caucasian nationalities, a genocide in the present day which is in Russia — it means I’m not the citizen of my country. It is easy to tell to itself, that the negative is not exist. But it is difficult to admit to itself that it is, and more difficult to resist to this, try to change it.
The cinema is the great tool.
With sincerity from Magas
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий